We have already covered the benefits of wind, solar, geothermal and electric cars in this blog space. But perhaps the most effective and inexpensive method to reducing our climate impacts is actually the simplest: improving energy efficiency standards. By making products and buildings that consume less energy, we can help reduce the amount of greenhouse gases needed to meet our energy needs. Energy efficiency improvements are particularly important because they have been proven to reduce energy demand while also saving the consumer money.

A recent analysis from Platts indicated that simply changing to more energy efficient air conditioners throughout the country could save $2.5 billion in energy costs annually and preclude the need for seven new mid-size power plants. The implementation of LEED certification for buildings has also saved billions in energy costs while also allowing property owners to charge more to rent space in these buildings. But almost all tenants end up spending less money renting these buildings because of decreased electric and water bills. Multiple studies have shown that these efficiency technologies end up paying for themselves rather quickly, and people are beginning to realize the benefits.

Even the Republican-controlled House recently passed legislation to improve standards for water heaters, refrigerators and air conditioners. The measure was sponsored by two Republicans and had backing from major industry institutions. Most of the support can be attributed to the demonstrated ability of energy efficiency measures to save money.

Energy Secretary Steve Chu has long been a proponent of energy efficiency measures and has helped bring the issue to the forefront of energy policy. Instituting these low cost changes can help save billions of dollars in the long-term budget picture.

Unsurprisingly, there is hope that a large-scale energy efficiency bill can be agreed upon during the next Congress. A prominent GOP House Energy and Commerce aide recently said that committee members are hoping to work with the Senate to pass “sweeping” new policies to help cut energy use and costs. Recent energy proposals from the House that involved rolling back air pollution rules are no longer being discussed and a more bipartisan effort should be expected in the new Congress. The agreement will likely be based on the Shaheen-Portman Bill, a measure co-sponsored by Rep. Jeanne Shaheen (D- New Hampshire) and Rep. Rob Portman (R- Ohio). Rep. Shaheen hopes that the key provisions of the bill, including reduced energy use at federal buildings and improved building code standards, will remain intact in the new legislation.

The Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act of 2012 would be a perfect complement to new energy efficiency legislation. It would reinforce energy efficiency standards while also making sure that a greater portion of the energy that we do use comes from renewable sources. By tackling the climate problem from both the supply and demand sides, the United States can become a leader in renewable energy solutions, create jobs and cut energy costs from future budgets.

DISCLAIMER: Environmental, Health and Safety News is not affiliated with or maintained by ANY for profit or non-profit entity. It is a 100% volunteer effort free from advertising or sponsorship of any kind. This site is intended to be an educational and not-for-profit website providing useful information for security, environmental, health, sciences, transportation, and public safety professionals and the general public. It is not “for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services.”
In the Webmaster’s opinion, any incidental use of any pictures and graphics, or quoted words on this site is not a violation of any trademark for the any reasons stated above. The webmaster will fully cooperate with any and everyone that believes any section of the site are in violation of fair use.

The use of any and all copyrighted works in the creation of this site is, in the Webmaster’s opinion, protected by 17 USC 107 (see Creative Commons License below). If the owner of a copyrighted work used in the creation of this site believes that 17 USC 107 does not apply to the use of their work, the site’s creator will cooperate to the fullest extent possible.

FAIR USE NOTE: The site provides information of a general & public nature regarding national or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this site. You should consult with an expert about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation. This site contains information and links to sites which are not owned or maintained by this site. This site is not responsible for the content, linked sites, and the views expressed on linked sites do not necessarily reflect our views or opinions. The information contained herein is provided for personal, non-commercial, educational, entertainment and informational purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee of information or facts. This site makes no claims, expressed, implied, or statutory regarding the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any material contained herein. Since the conditions of use are outside my control, the individual visitor is entirely responsible for determining the appropriateness and applicability of all information contained herein.

This website is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Back to Top