Earthtechling- Investment advisors like Barron’s are apparently alarmed by a sudden drop in U.S. energy use, and believe that it indicates that our economy must now be in the deep freeze. Money guys—who always equate rise in GDP with rise in energy use—can imagine no other explanation for reduced energy use than that we are now experiencing economic doom, hiding in caves and struggling to work in wheelbarrows instead of our God-given SUVs.

Those of us who read green tech news, of course, know that decoupling energy use from GDP is the holy grail of an advanced low-carbon economy—that the world’s climate-conscious nations are striving to achieve. There’s even a pretty common name for it, “reducing energy intensity.”

Cooling-economy-energy-use

image via Gold-Speculator

For example, we read here how GM cut the energy intensity of its manufacturing plant 30 percednt or that globally, energy intensity has not dropped—mostly because developing nations tend not to do as well as already industrialized ones, and there’s more of them now, with China ramping up.

But it is a given in climate policy circles that cutting the amount of energy used to generate a unit of GDP is a good thing—a target to aim for.

So it is a bit disconcerting (to this green reader, at least) to notice that this is not the typical view. We all dwell in such different walled information-ghettos that the same news means something completely different to others.

Yes, we went through a financial near-depression in 2008. But simultaneously, we had also begun serious climate policy in 2005 that has been yielding great energy news every day on green tech sites for the last four years.

By contrast with our satisfaction with stories of energy efficiency, among the money-centric, there is a hysterical reaction of alarm in response to news of the drop in energy use over the last few years, first fretted about by the Wall Street Journal during the financial shock of 2008. (Perhaps this visceral fear of less energy use is what is behind the antique lightbulb fetish of the Republican Congress?)

GDP-above-2008-now

image via Bureau of Economic Analysis

And even though now our GDP is now back up above 2008 levels, our energy use remains far below 2008 levels. How can that be?

Well, that’s what better building codes, utility efficiency improvements, tighter appliance efficiency advances and higher CAFE standards are all about.

Please continue reading at:

DISCLAIMER: Environmental, Health and Safety News is not affiliated with or maintained by ANY for profit or non-profit entity. It is a 100% volunteer effort free from advertising or sponsorship of any kind. This site is intended to be an educational and not-for-profit website providing useful information for security, environmental, health, sciences, transportation, and public safety professionals and the general public. It is not “for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services.”
In the Webmaster’s opinion, any incidental use of any pictures and graphics, or quoted words on this site is not a violation of any trademark for the any reasons stated above. The webmaster will fully cooperate with any and everyone that believes any section of the site are in violation of fair use.

The use of any and all copyrighted works in the creation of this site is, in the Webmaster’s opinion, protected by 17 USC 107 (see Creative Commons License below). If the owner of a copyrighted work used in the creation of this site believes that 17 USC 107 does not apply to the use of their work, the site’s creator will cooperate to the fullest extent possible.

FAIR USE NOTE: The site provides information of a general & public nature regarding national or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this site. You should consult with an expert about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation. This site contains information and links to sites which are not owned or maintained by this site. This site is not responsible for the content, linked sites, and the views expressed on linked sites do not necessarily reflect our views or opinions. The information contained herein is provided for personal, non-commercial, educational, entertainment and informational purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee of information or facts. This site makes no claims, expressed, implied, or statutory regarding the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any material contained herein. Since the conditions of use are outside my control, the individual visitor is entirely responsible for determining the appropriateness and applicability of all information contained herein.

This website is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Back to Top