I live in Ohio and recently I’ve noticed toxic algal blooms have become a huge issue and we’re in the news. I’m not sure where I read it, but I’m under the impression that the algal blooms are growing due to a lack of legislation limiting the fertilizers that farmers can use and/or controlling their runoff. The general consensus is that because our legislators are in the pockets of the local agriculture industry, this is likely to occur again.

The massive algal bloom is occurring because their is a high level of nutrients (toxins?) in the water systems, so why not capitalize off of it since our legislators are unlikely to make the positive change necessary? Recently there has been research into floating greenhouses and their potential to clean the river by pulling nutrients from the pollution.

So what’s stopping this from being widely adopted? I’m not an environmental engineer or a biologist so my knowledge on the issue is limited, but I currently don’t see any reason why this isn’t being widely adopted to make the best of a bad situation.

submitted by BLKSheep93
[link] [comment]

Shared from environment
please read full here http://ift.tt/1GBqGzw

DISCLAIMER: Environmental, Health and Safety News is not affiliated with or maintained by ANY for profit or non-profit entity. It is a 100% volunteer effort free from advertising or sponsorship of any kind. This site is intended to be an educational and not-for-profit website providing useful information for security, environmental, health, sciences, transportation, and public safety professionals and the general public. It is not “for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services.”
In the Webmaster’s opinion, any incidental use of any pictures and graphics, or quoted words on this site is not a violation of any trademark for the any reasons stated above. The webmaster will fully cooperate with any and everyone that believes any section of the site are in violation of fair use.

The use of any and all copyrighted works in the creation of this site is, in the Webmaster’s opinion, protected by 17 USC 107 (see Creative Commons License below). If the owner of a copyrighted work used in the creation of this site believes that 17 USC 107 does not apply to the use of their work, the site’s creator will cooperate to the fullest extent possible.

FAIR USE NOTE: The site provides information of a general & public nature regarding national or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this site. You should consult with an expert about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation. This site contains information and links to sites which are not owned or maintained by this site. This site is not responsible for the content, linked sites, and the views expressed on linked sites do not necessarily reflect our views or opinions. The information contained herein is provided for personal, non-commercial, educational, entertainment and informational purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee of information or facts. This site makes no claims, expressed, implied, or statutory regarding the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any material contained herein. Since the conditions of use are outside my control, the individual visitor is entirely responsible for determining the appropriateness and applicability of all information contained herein.

This website is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Back to Top