​NBC: One of the government’s best weapons for responding to a nuclear terrorist attack or accident in Southern California is being moved 2000 miles away Monday, despite objections from experts and some government officials, the NBC4 I-Team has learned.

It’s a move some lawmakers and emergency response experts believe could leave California vulnerable.

For years, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has housed their Mobile Environmental Radiation Lab, or “MERL,” in Las Vegas, so it could respond to a nuclear incident on the West Coast within hours. But today, the agency began moving the lab — comprised of two large trucks — to a new home at an EPA radiation office in Montgomery, Alabama.

“It’s the best radioactivity lab I’ve seen on wheels and it’s better than most stationary radioactivity labs,” said Professor Vern Hodge of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who teaches nuclear science at the campus near the MERL’s former home.

Decision Could Leave CA Vulnerable to Nuclear Disaster
“If they move this asset, they are on purpose jeopardizing the lives of people,” Hodge added.

Nuclear radiation experts, including current and former employees, tell the NBC4 I-Team that if there was a dirty bomb detonated in the LA area, or an accident at a nuclear power plant, the MERL could quickly identify radiation in the air, water, and soil, and the MERL staff could then help emergency responders decide when and where to evacuate people.

When the MERL was housed in Las Vegas, it could get to a nuclear incident in California’s biggest cities within hours. Now, once it arrives at its new base in Alabama, it could take five days or longer to respond to a disaster on the West Coast.

“Do you want to be the one who says ‘I decided to get rid of this laboratory,’ and then (an incident) happens?” asked Dr. Richard Flotard, a retired US-EPA radiation chemist. Flotard was among the current and former EPA officials who told the I-Team they opposed moving the emergency lab so far from California.

The EPA official in charge of the MERL, Mike Flynn, said he was moving the lab to Alabama to save money, where there’s a second MERL that will be taken out of service. “We don’t have the resources to support two, and also we can accomplish our mission with one,” Flynn said.

But lawmakers in several western states asked the EPA in recent weeks to leave the lab in Las Vegas. Gov. Jerry Brown’s Office of Emergency Services told the EPA in a letter that it “strongly objects” to moving the MERL so far from California.

But the EPA moved ahead with its decision, and Monday morning, without an announcement, rolled the lab out of Las Vegas, beginning its journey to Alabama.

​Please read on at:
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Nuclear-Response-Lab-Moves-California-314765621.html​

DISCLAIMER: Environmental, Health and Safety News is not affiliated with or maintained by ANY for profit or non-profit entity. It is a 100% volunteer effort free from advertising or sponsorship of any kind. This site is intended to be an educational and not-for-profit website providing useful information for security, environmental, health, sciences, transportation, and public safety professionals and the general public. It is not “for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services.”
In the Webmaster’s opinion, any incidental use of any pictures and graphics, or quoted words on this site is not a violation of any trademark for the any reasons stated above. The webmaster will fully cooperate with any and everyone that believes any section of the site are in violation of fair use.

The use of any and all copyrighted works in the creation of this site is, in the Webmaster’s opinion, protected by 17 USC 107 (see Creative Commons License below). If the owner of a copyrighted work used in the creation of this site believes that 17 USC 107 does not apply to the use of their work, the site’s creator will cooperate to the fullest extent possible.

FAIR USE NOTE: The site provides information of a general & public nature regarding national or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this site. You should consult with an expert about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation. This site contains information and links to sites which are not owned or maintained by this site. This site is not responsible for the content, linked sites, and the views expressed on linked sites do not necessarily reflect our views or opinions. The information contained herein is provided for personal, non-commercial, educational, entertainment and informational purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee of information or facts. This site makes no claims, expressed, implied, or statutory regarding the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any material contained herein. Since the conditions of use are outside my control, the individual visitor is entirely responsible for determining the appropriateness and applicability of all information contained herein.

This website is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Back to Top